// models

Open models.
Frontier results.

The open frontier already covers the work enterprises actually run, retrieval, code, agents, extraction. Benchmarked against the closed labs, proven in production, served only from the EU.

// our models

Models we serve at Helmcode.

The complete catalogue on the Shared cluster: 8 models behind one OpenAI-compatible API, all of them open-weight, all served from the EU. Model IDs are shown as-is, copy them straight into your code.

Language models

glm-5.2 MIT 744B MoE · 40B active · 500K ctx · add-on Long-horizon agentic coding and hard maths. Sold per key, €150 a month.
deepseek-v4-flash MIT 284B MoE · 21B active · NVFP4 · 1M ctx Reasoning, agents and long-context analysis. Native tool calling.
qwen3.6 Apache 2.0 35B MoE · 3B active · NVFP4 · 256K ctx High-volume RAG, classification and code. Multimodal input.
gemma4 Gemma 26B MoE · 4B active · NVFP4 · 256K ctx Efficient assistants, documents and scans. Multimodal input.

Embeddings & reranking

qwen3-embedding Apache 2.0 8B · 4096 dims · Float32 · MMTEB 70.58 The retrieval layer of a RAG pipeline, 100+ languages.
rerank Apache 2.0 Qwen3-Reranker-8B · BF16 · /v1/rerank Reorders the retrieved top-k by real relevance.

Speech

whisper-large-v3 MIT 99+ languages · 3.2% WER (Spanish) Speech to text for calls, meetings and media.
kokoro Apache 2.0 82M params · <1s latency · 67 voices Text to speech for live agents and IVR, Spanish included.

Every model here runs on Helmcode today. On Dedicated and On-premise plans we also serve custom or fine-tuned open-weight models on hardware reserved for you.

Full model reference in the docs

// the 80 / 20

Open models cover 80% of enterprise inference.

The work that runs your business, RAG, classification, code generation, internal assistants, is solved today by open-weight models. The 20% where you truly need a frontier closed model is narrower than it looks.

The 80%, open, private, flat-rate
  • RAG over internal knowledge
  • Classification & routing
  • Code generation & review
  • Internal assistants & copilots
  • Document extraction
  • Summarization
  • Translation
  • Autonomous agents
The 20%, frontier closed labs

Bleeding-edge reasoning at the very limit of capability. Real, but specific, and rarely the workload a regulated team needs to keep in-house. We are honest about that boundary instead of pretending it doesn't exist.

// benchmark · artificial analysis

Frontier-class intelligence, open-weight prices.

The Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index is a composite of nine hard evaluations, GPQA Diamond, SciCode, Terminal-Bench, Humanity's Last Exam and more. Open-weight models now sit just under the closed frontier.

Claude Opus 5 Anthropic 61 $5.00 / $25.00
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic 60 $10.00 / $50.00
GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI 59 $5.00 / $30.00
Kimi K3 Moonshot open 57 $3.00 / $15.00
GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI 55 $2.50 / $15.00
GLM-5.2 Z.AI on helmcode 51 $1.40 / $4.40
DeepSeek V4 Pro DeepSeek open 44 $0.43 / $0.87
DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek on helmcode 40 $0.14 / $0.28
Qwen3.6 35B Alibaba on helmcode 32 $0.25 / $1.49
Gemma 4 26B Google on helmcode 26 $0.13 / $0.40

Kimi K3 now leads the open weights at 57, ahead of Claude Opus 4.8 (56) and GPT-5.5 (55), the closed frontier of the previous release cycle. GLM-5.2 follows at 51, level with GPT-5.6 Luna (51.2), and we serve it: the highest-scoring model on the platform, sold as a per-key add-on. Behind it sit the models your plan covers: DeepSeek V4 Flash (40), Qwen3.6 35B (32) and Gemma 4 26B (26). DeepSeek V4 Flash scores 40 at $0.14 / $0.28 per million tokens, against Claude Opus 5's $5.00 / $25.00, that's ~35× cheaper to read and ~90× cheaper to write, for 66% of the index leader's intelligence.

Source: artificialanalysis.ai · Intelligence Index v4.1 · July 2026 · composite of 9 evaluations · price = first-party API, per 1M tokens (input · output), rounded to whole points. Rows marked on helmcode, GLM-5.2, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Qwen3.6 35B and Gemma 4 26B, are the ones we serve, with GLM-5.2 sold per key rather than covered by the plan. Kimi K3 and DeepSeek V4 Pro are open-weight but not on the platform: K3 needs roughly 64 GPUs of the H100 or B200 class to serve, and its weights ship under Moonshot's own K3 licence rather than an OSI-approved one.

// proven in production

The production numbers.

On our own platform, near-enough all inference already runs on open models, and most of it on a single 35B one.

333.8B

Tokens in production

cumulative

76%

Run on Qwen 3.6 (35B)

the open workhorse

99.5%

Of tokens on open models

LLM traffic

See the live numbers on OpenData

// the lineup

What actually runs the 80%.

The three language models, ordered by real production token share. One open 35B model carries most of the load, the rest step in for reasoning, scale and multimodal.

qwen3.6 35B MoE · 256K ctx 76.1% High-volume RAG, classification, code
deepseek-v4-flash 284B MoE · 1M ctx 12.4% Reasoning, agents, long-context
gemma4 26B MoE · 256K ctx 2.4% Efficient assistants, document work

Plus embeddings & reranking (qwen3-embedding, rerank) and speech (kokoro, whisper-large-v3), eight models on one API. Full model reference →

// models faq

Open models, answered.

The questions everyone asks before trusting open models in production.

Are open models actually good enough?

For the work enterprises run day to day, yes. On Artificial Analysis’ Intelligence Index, the leading open-weight model, Kimi K3, scores 57 against 61 for the closed leader, Claude Opus 5, and the model we serve, DeepSeek V4 Flash, delivers around two-thirds of leader-level intelligence for cents per million tokens. In production, 99.5% of all tokens on Helmcode already flow through open models. The gap that remains is a narrow set of frontier tasks most teams never hit.

Which model should I use?

Start with Qwen 3.6, it carries three quarters of all production traffic and is the fastest, cheapest path for RAG, classification and code. Move to DeepSeek V4-Flash for hard reasoning, agents or 1M-token context. For image and audio input, Qwen 3.6 and Gemma 4 are both multimodal. Same API, just change the model id.

What about the 20% that genuinely needs a frontier model?

It exists, and it is more specific than most assume, frontier-only reasoning at the very edge of capability. Helmcode is honest about that boundary: we cover the 80% that runs your business, privately and at a flat rate, not the last mile of the leaderboard.

How current are these benchmarks?

Figures are published scores as of July 2026, open models served on Helmcode, closed-model numbers from vendor reports. Benchmarks move every release, so treat them as directional. What does not move is where your data is processed: always the EU, always zero logs.

Can I run a model that is not listed?

On Dedicated and On-premise plans, yes, custom or fine-tuned open-weight models on hardware reserved for you. The Shared cluster serves the curated lineup above.

// get started

START BURNING TOKENS

Skip the AI infra work. Deploy your first private inference endpoint today.

Flat rate. EU data. OpenAI API compatible.